Pan-cancer analysis of Sushi domain-containing protein 4 (SUSD4) and validated in colorectal cancer.

Sushi domain-containing protein 4 (SUSD4) is a complement regulatory protein whose primary function is to inhibit the complement system, and it is involved in immune regulation. The role of SUSD4 in cancer progression has largely remained elusive. SUSD4 was studied across a variety of cancer types in this study. According to the results, there is an association between the expression level of SUSD4 and prognosis in multiple types of cancer. Further analysis demonstrated that SUSD4 expression level was related to immune cell infiltration, immune-related genes, tumor heterogeneity, and multiple cancer pathways. Additionally, we validated the function of SUSD4 in colorectal cancer cell lines and found that knockdown of SUSD4 inhibited cell growth and impacted the JAK/STAT pathway. By characterizing drug sensitivity in organoids, we found that the expression of SUSD4 showed a positive correlation trend with IC50 of Selumetinib, YK-4-279, and Piperlongumine. In conclusion, SUSD4 is a valuable prognostic indicator for diverse types of cancer, and it has the potential to be a target for cancer therapy.

Pan-Cancer analysis and experimental validation identify the oncogenic nature of ESPL1: Potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer.

Introduction: Extra spindle pole bodies like 1 (ESPL1) are required to continue the cell cycle, and its primary role is to initiate the final segregation of sister chromatids. Although prior research has revealed a link between ESPL1 and the development of cancer, no systematic pan-cancer analysis has been conducted. Combining multi-omics data with bioinformatics, we have thoroughly described the function of ESPL1 in cancer. In addition, we examined the impact of ESPL1 on the proliferation of numerous cancer cell lines. In addition, the connection between ESPL1 and medication sensitivity was verified using organoids obtained from colorectal cancer patients. All these results confirm the oncogene nature of ESPL1. Methods: Herein, we downloaded raw data from numerous publicly available databases and then applied R software and online tools to explore the association of ESPL1 expression with prognosis, survival, tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, and mutational profiles. To validate the oncogene nature of ESPL1, we have performed a knockdown of the target gene in various cancer cell lines to verify the effect of ESPL1 on proliferation and migration. In addition, patients' derived organoids were used to verify drug sensitivity. Results: The study found that ESPL1 expression was markedly upregulated in tumorous tissues compared to normal tissues, and high expression of ESPL1 was significantly associated with poor prognosis in a range of cancers. Furthermore, the study revealed that tumors with high ESPL1 expression tended to be more heterogeneous based on various tumor heterogeneity indicators. Enrichment analysis showed that ESPL1 is involved in mediating multiple cancer-related pathways. Notably, the study found that interference with ESPL1 expression significantly inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells. Additionally, the higher the expression of ESPL1 in organoids, the greater the sensitivity to PHA-793887, PAC-1, and AZD7762. Discussion: Taken together, our study provides evidence that ESPL1 may implicate tumorigenesis and disease progression across multiple cancer types, highlighting its potential utility as both a prognostic indicator and therapeutic target.

CircSTK3 drives the metastasis of colorectal cancer by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) play crucial roles in malignancies. We aimed to delineate the functions and clinical importance of dysregulated circRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the circRNA expression profile from five CRC and paired adjacent normal tissues using circRNA microarray. We found that a novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0004592 (named circSTK3), was significantly upregulated in CRC tissues and correlated with decreased survival. Loss- and gain-of-function assays revealed that circSTK3 promoted the migration and invasion but not proliferation of cells. Whole genome expression microarray identified potential downstream targets and the regulatory networks of circSTK3; Gene Ontology analysis confirmed circSTK3 involvement in the CRC metastasis phenotype. Abnormal circSTK3 expression affected a subset of genes associated with CRC metastasis and triggered epithelial-mesenchymal transition programming, maintaining a tumor-promoting signature. Moreover, circSTK3 was transcriptionally regulated by CTCF. These findings reveal the functional and prognostic roles of circSTK3 and expose circRNAs as key players in metastasis.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES.

Background: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) have been applied to colorectal cancer (CRC). Different types of NOSES have been proposed. Traditional laparoscopic CRC surgeries (non-NOSES) have been widely adopted in clinical practice. Therefore, the safety and feasibility of NOSES could be clarified by comparing with non-NOSES. Methods: Consecutive cases who underwent NOSE or non-NOSE rectal surgeries were retrospectively collected at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Other inclusion criteria included patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, over the age of 18 and undergoing primary laparoscopic rectal resection. Patients who were lost to follow-up or had incomplete information were excluded. Basic characteristics including gender, tumor location, age, staging, treatment, and Body Mass Index (BMI) were analyzed. Short-term outcomes including comorbidities, intra-operative blood loss, hospital stay, gas exhaust time were compared between different NOSES and non-NOSES groups. Long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were also analyzed. Patients were followed-up during the inpatient period, at an outpatient clinic, or by phone call. Results: A total of 196 NOSES cases and 243 non-NOSES cases were included. There was a sex difference between the two groups and other factors were comparable. Cases were divided into NOSES groups [including extra-abdominal resection (EVER), specimen extraction and extra-abdominal resection (EXER), and intra-abdominal resection and specimen extraction (IREX)] and non-NOSES groups. Differences in sex (P=0.016), BMI (with mean of 22.08, 22.00, 22.53, and 23.26 kg/m2, P=0.003), and staging (P=0.008) were observed between the four groups. There was a difference in the intra-operative blood loss between NOSES and non-NOSES groups (57.05±62.78, 52.65±68.19, 36.52±43.99 vs. 76.12±90.11 mL, P=0.002), in which NOSES groups had less blood loss. Furthermore, NOSES groups showed a better post-operative gas exhaust time (54.68±37.80, 45.06±24.69, 47.91±28.93 vs. 56.94±27.69 hours, P=0.012). NOSES groups also had fewer ileostomies (17 vs. 37, P=0.003). There was no difference in the long-term DFS and OS between the two groups. Conclusions: NOSES in rectal cancer showed better short-term outcomes and had comparable long-term outcomes compared with non-NOSE surgeries.

N6-Methyladenosine Regulators Are Involved in the Progression of and Have Clinical Impact on Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification has been widely studied in various cancers, and m6A regulators, such as METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, and YTHDF1, play crucial roles in breast cancer. However, a comprehensive study of m6A regulators in breast cancer is still lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS Expression data of m6A regulators and clinicopathological information were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program. Protein interaction was collected from the STRING database. Data on tumor purity and correlation among m6A regulators were obtained from the TIMER database. LASSO, consensus clustering, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to evaluate the role of m6A regulators. Moreover, the prognostic value of m6A-related genomic targets in breast cancer was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. RESULTS We found most m6A regulators were associated with key clinicopathological parameters, such as tumor staging, Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), and cellularity. Also, consensus clustering analysis-based grouping could effectively predict patients' overall survival. Correlation analysis also showed that these regulators interacted with each other. Patients were further split into a high-risk group and low-risk group based on Cox and LASSO analysis. High-risk patients had a significantly worse overall survival than did low-risk patients. Moreover, AKT1 and MYC were enriched in patients in the high-risk group, according to GSEA analysis. The patients in the high-risk group also displayed resistance to chemoradiotherapy or hormone therapy. CONCLUSIONS The m6A regulators are critical participants in the development and progression of breast cancer and are likely to be used to predict prognosis and develop treatment strategies.